Ever sat in a meeting where someone declared, “Our competitors just added six new features, so we need to add eight!”? It’s a knee-jerk reaction that ignores a startling truth: research suggests around 60% of product features gather digital dust, rarely or never used by customers.
So how do we escape this endless feature race that bloats our products without adding real value? Enter the Kano Model, a powerful framework for distinguishing between genuine customer needs and distracting bells and whistles. At its essence, the Kano customer satisfaction model answers the question of what businesses should focus on to maximise resource efficiency, thereby increasing satisfaction.
Developed in the 1980s by Professor Noriaki Kano, the Kano Model of customer satisfaction revolutionized how product teams prioritize features. It shows that customer satisfaction doesn’t follow a linear path. Some features barely register when present but cause uproar when missing, while others create surprise and delight by solving problems customers didn’t even realize they had.
Think about your smartphone’s camera. Would you buy one without it in 2025? Probably not – it’s expected. But remember when Portrait Mode first appeared? That feature exceeded expectations and created genuine excitement.
The Kano diagram divides features into five categories, each impacting customer satisfaction differently:
Reverse Features (Backfires)
Features that actually reduce satisfaction despite good intentions.
Example: Microsoft’s “Clippy” assistant annoyed users so much that its removal was celebrated.
In product management, the Kano analysis helps teams:
For example, Dropbox focused on flawless basics like syncing plus one major delighter – simple file sharing – and grew from 100,000 to 4 million users in 15 months.
Instead of just asking, “Would you like feature X?”, the Kano model uses paired questions:
Responses like “I like it that way” or “I dislike it that way” help categorize features more accurately.
Cross-reference paired answers to classify features as Basic, Performance, Delighter, Indifferent, or Reverse. Use tools like ProductPlan or spreadsheets to automate this Kano model prioritization.
Prioritize fixes to basic needs first, then focus on strategic delighters and performance features. Deprioritize indifferent or reverse features. Visualize this on a simple matrix showing effort vs. Kano impact.
Feature categories evolve. Yesterday’s delighter becomes tomorrow’s basic need. Revisit your Kano model analysis every few months to stay aligned with customer expectations.
By investing in delighters, Notion grew from 1 million to 4 million users in a year, eventually reaching a $10 billion valuation.
Feature Evolution Tracker
Track how features shift categories over time (e.g., Dark Mode: Delighter → Performance → Basic Need).
The Kano Model of customer satisfaction transforms feature prioritization from opinion-based debates to a structured, customer-focused process. It helps build products that meet expectations and create lasting delight and loyalty.
Remember: Every feature adds cost and cognitive load. Choose wisely. What basic needs might your product be neglecting? What delighters could set you apart? The Kano Model gives you the confidence to prioritize features that truly matter.
To use a Kano model effectively, start by crafting a pair of questions for each potential feature-one functional (“How would you feel if feature X were present?”) and one dysfunctional (“How would you feel if feature X were absent?”) then survey a representative set of users to collect their reactions. Next, analyze the paired responses to categorize each feature as a basic need, performance need, delighter, indifferent, or reverse feature. Finally, estimate the implementation effort for each item and plot them on a two-axis chart (effort on the X-axis and impact on satisfaction on the Y-axis). This visualization helps you prioritize must-have basics first, invest in performance enhancements next, and sprinkle in strategic delighters—while deprioritizing or dropping features that add little or negative value.
Within Six Sigma’s DMAIC framework (Define–Measure–Analyze–Improve–Control), the Kano model:
When simplifying, focus on these three tiers:
Kano measurement is the process of quantifying survey responses to determine the percentage of users classifying each feature into the five Kano categories. You tally how many “I like it” vs. “I expect it” combinations map to Basic, Performance, Delighter, Indifferent, or Reverse, yielding a clear, data-backed feature profile.
Apply the same framework to workplace initiatives:
About Institute of Product Leadership
University Programs
Product Management Course
Technology Management Course
Product Community
Free Resources
Toolkits & Templates